LSU > Spring 2010

RICHARDSON M (ENGL)

Grading History

The grades listed below are the actual grades assigned by this instructor over the last few semesters, based on official records from LSU.

TIP: Click a course number below to see how other instructors scored.

Course Average W A B C D F Enrolled

Review Summary

50% recommended (1 of 2 reviews)

Category Average A B C D F Reviews
Overall Instructor C (1.500) 0 1 0 0 1 2
Overall Course C (2.000) 0 1 0 1 0 2
Communication Skills B (2.500) 0 1 1 0 0 2
Personality B (2.500) 1 0 0 1 0 2
Course Content B (3.000) 0 2 0 0 0 2
Exams and Grading C (2.000) 1 0 0 0 1 2
Time Required C (2.000) 0 0 2 0 0 2
Grade You Earned B (3.000) 0 2 0 0 0 2

Courses Taught in Spring 2010

Section Course Days Start End Enrolled Avail Type Average W-Rate Distro Instructor Room/Building
1 ENGL 7137-1 MW 1:40p 3:00p 8 4 SEM RICHARDSON M 0202 ALLEN
45 ENGL 8000-45 TBA TBA 99 RES RICHARDSON M
45 ENGL 8900-45 TBA TBA 99 RES RICHARDSON M
45 ENGL 9000-45 TBA TBA 1 98 RES RICHARDSON M

Reviews

Not Recommended/F Instructor
Recommended/D Course
C Communication Skills
D Personality
B Course Content
F Exams and Grading
C Time Required
C Grade You Earned
Review #1 / Course: ENGL 3020 / Instructor: RICHARDSON M
British Lit is definitely a worthwhile course, but Richardson actually succeeds in making the Middle Ages as boring as his personality. If you expect more than powerpoints every day from a 3000 level English class, don't take Malcom.
Posted: 5/7/2008 8:37:13 PM
Recommended/B Instructor
Recommended/B Course
B Communication Skills
A+ Personality
B Course Content
A+ Exams and Grading
C Time Required
B Grade You Earned
Review #2 / Course: ENGL 2148 / Instructor: RICHARDSON M
Good Class About Shakespeare. Dr. Richardson really cares. Not an easy class to fill Gen Ed Requirements. Take Dr. Richardson.
Posted: 12/14/2006 8:27:11 PM

These reviews are the subjective opinions of UniversityTools.com users and not the opinions of UniversityTools.com or Velocity Squared, LLC. The original submitter of the review is solely responsible for the review contents.